Structural Concrete, Vol. 4, no. 2, June 2003

Written on 19 August 2011.

Structural behaviour of steel fibre reinforced concrete

I. Kovacs, College Faculty of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary
G. L. Balazs, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Construction Materials and Engineering Geology, Hungary

Results of an experimental study on 21 fibre reinforced concrete beams indicate that steel fibres do not only increase shear capacity but also provide substantial post-peak resistance and ductility in conventionally reinforced beams as well as in prestressed pretensioned concrete beams. The tests were carried out on 2m long beam specimens reinforced with longitudinal bars and fibres. Test variables were amount and type of fibres, amount of stirrups and type of longitudinal reinforcement (prestressed or non-prestressed).

Structural Concrete, Vol. 4, no. 2, June 2003

Written on 19 August 2011.

Structural behaviour of steel fibre reinforced concrete

I. Kovacs, College Faculty of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary
G. L. Balazs, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Construction Materials and Engineering Geology, Hungary

Results of an experimental study on 21 fibre reinforced concrete beams indicate that steel fibres do not only increase shear capacity but also provide substantial post-peak resistance and ductility in conventionally reinforced beams as well as in prestressed pretensioned concrete beams. The tests were carried out on 2m long beam specimens reinforced with longitudinal bars and fibres. Test variables were amount and type of fibres, amount of stirrups and type of longitudinal reinforcement (prestressed or non-prestressed).

Structural Concrete, Vol. 4, no. 2, June 2003

Written on 19 August 2011.

Message from the President Jim Forbes, President of the fib

No abstract

Structural Concrete, Vol. 4, no. 1, March 2003

Written on 19 August 2011.

The power of prestressing

Jiri Strasky, Technical University of Brno, and Strasky Husty and Partners, Brno, Czech Republic

The idea of prestressing - a product of the twentieth century - has announced the single most significant new direction in structural engineering of any period in history. It put into the hands of the designer an ability to control structural behaviour and, at the same time, it enabled the designer - or forced the designer - to think more deeply about the construction. Moreover, the idea of prestressing opened up new possibilities for a form that influences the general culture. To focus on that fact, and to narrow the scope, the paper will consider bridges only, even though prestressing has broad applications to all kinds of buildings. However, the idea of prestressing arose out of bridge design, and its most impressive forms, from a purely engineering viewpoint, have appeared in bridges.

Structural Concrete, Vol. 4, no. 1, March 2003

Written on 19 August 2011.

The influence of silica fume on the factors affecting the corrosion of reinforcement in concrete: a review

Rajaiah Selvaraj, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Tamilnadu, India
Srinivasan Muralidharan, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Tamilnadu, India
Seshadri Srinivasan, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Tamilnadu, India

The effect of silica fume in concrete is reviewed from the point of view of chloride diffusion, carbonation, oxygen diffusion, the pH of the pore solution and electrical resistivity, as they are the main parameters influencing the corrosion phenomenon in concrete.

Structural Concrete, Vol. 4, no. 1, March 2003

Written on 19 August 2011.

Three criteria of acceptable risk

Niels C. Lind, University of Waterloo, Canada

Structural safety is a part of general safety in a society. Safety factors should conform to a general rationale for all life safety. Two rationales are presented here, using a principle of time economy and using social indicators. The common-sense time principle of risk management states that a `life-saving' alternative, if it is truly to save lives, should return to the community more years of life in good health than the years of work consumed to pay for its cost. Alternatively, a risk acceptability criterion can be derived from a compound social indicator that reflects general benefit to society and that is a function of gross domestic product and life expectancy. To be acceptable, alternatives should increase the social indicator. The two compound social indicators, the Life Quality Index and the Human Development Index, yield practically identical criteria for risk acceptance.